Saturday, 3 August 2019
Modi is nothing if not a master of tough decisions
This article appeared on Ritam
The time period of 1942-47 found a curious mention by Prime
Minister Narendra Modi in a speech last week while interacting with newly
elected MPs. Evoking the historic phase that galvanised the country against the
colonial rulers, Modi said that a similar mobilisation is now needed to win the
battle against poverty. Interestingly, this was the second consecutive speech
since his stunning victory in which he repeatedly mentioned poverty elimination
as a target.
India’s battle against poverty has seen several decades,
elections, governments, leaders and social changes. The mandate of 2019,
however, has changed India’s development linguistics. The mandate has rejected
the offer of short-term benefits and spoken in favour of enduring solutions.
The electorate has increasingly shown awareness of the fact that the problem
needs a holistic approach targeting the 350 million Below Poverty Line (BPL)
population and also encompassing the 400 million strong middle class.
It is a fact that the achievements of Modi’s first term have
laid the ground for substantial gains in his second term. Check on pilferages
and corruption, disbursement of benefits to more than 20 crore people and
implementation of transparency in governance are only some of these measures.
It was a result of these that the government was re-elected for a second time
with a bigger mandate. It is safe to say that no one is more aware of the
strength of this mandate than Narendra Modi himself who is likely to wage a
multi-pronged onslaught for revolutionary outcomes.
Karnataka & Goa Congress defections: Political opportunism or did ideology never matter?
This write-up appeared in the Talk Point segment of The Print
My take: Congress workers are disenchanted today and looking to the other side, which is making the right moves
My take: Congress workers are disenchanted today and looking to the other side, which is making the right moves
A political party represents a unity of ideas and a coming
together of like-minded people. Leaders may join or leave a party any time,
which is why the message that a party stands for is far more important that the
leaders themselves.
Congress is facing a ‘Ship of Theseus’ crisis today because
its leaders have become bigger than the party itself. The Congress leadership,
organisation and its ideology in 2019 is in deep trouble because of this.
Thursday, 27 June 2019
Modi is an informed choice in 2019
(This article first appeared in Kamal Sandesh)
If in 2014 Modi was a gamble, in 2019 he has been an
informed choice; if vote for Modi then was an expression of anti-incumbency,
this time it has been an assertion of right choice; if Modi’14 was magic and
wave, then Modi‘19 is the voice of ‘New India’ loud and clear.
While the 2019 election seems to have built up on the
aspirations of 2014, there is one crucial way in which it has been different.
In this election we are no longer looking through the narrow prism of old
vertical identities of caste, language and religion, among others. We have now
seen the rise of new interest groups such as poor, women, youth, disabled and
farmers. As the old watertight and discriminatory identities are now blurring,
people are now relating more to the emerging interest groups that represent
their concerns better. In 2019, Modi has effectively captured the imagination
of these interest groups and has come to represent the voice of an India of new
identities.
Should Rahul Gandhi get rid of Leftist aides or is it still not enough to revive Congress?
(This write-up appeared as a 'Quick Take' in The Print)
Any long-lasting political victory stands on the foundation of an ideological movement. The Congress party of Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi carried the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and many Gandhians were part of its politics in post-Independence era. But decades of political splits and dissensions denuded this foundation and by 2006, the advisory council led by Sonia Gandhi was already full of people who were Left-leaning.
Rahul Gandhi should know when you raise issues of fringe groups, you are likely to end up becoming one
Any long-lasting political victory stands on the foundation of an ideological movement. The Congress party of Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi carried the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and many Gandhians were part of its politics in post-Independence era. But decades of political splits and dissensions denuded this foundation and by 2006, the advisory council led by Sonia Gandhi was already full of people who were Left-leaning.
In truth, Rahul Gandhi simply followed this pattern and it
was not surprising that many of his advisers were old Communists and pushed
ideas that suited them. For example, the national vice-president of any
mainstream political party will not easily go to JNU to protest the arrest of a
student leader charged with raising anti-India slogans. When you raise issues
of fringe organisations, you are likely to end up becoming one and that is
exactly what Rahul Gandhi’s Congress did in the last few years. At a time when
the Lok Sabha elections were taking place in the backdrop of a major terror
attack, promising abolition of AFSPA and sedition law becomes an ideological luxury
that one cannot afford.
The Rahul Gandhi-led Congress, influenced by Left-leaning
organisations, does not represent the value systems that it did half a century
ago. While there may be structural and organisational shortcomings in Rahul
Gandhi’s Congress, but the real work lies in reinventing its ideological
foundation – the only thing that can ensure its survival.
Is Modi correct in saying media is biased against him in his pre-election interviews?
(This write-up appeared as a 'Quick Take' in The Print)
As chief minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi sustained a double-digit growth rate and started several innovative schemes, but was never credited in the media.
It is time journalists remove their tinted glasses and see Modi for the man and the PM he is
As chief minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi sustained a double-digit growth rate and started several innovative schemes, but was never credited in the media.
In the last five years too, Modi started several schemes
that benefitted crores of people but an unbiased evaluation of these schemes
was missing from the op-ed pages of the Delhi print media, especially the
English media.
A section of the elite media sees him as an ‘outsider’ and
approaches him with a sense of ‘otherness’. This segment does not see Modi as
its representative. They are allowed to have their personal beliefs, but the
problem is that it gets reflected in their professional output. Modi is an
elected leader and even if journalists are unable to relate to Modi, they are
duty-bound to cast their personal bias aside when making a journalistic call.
If Narendra Modi govt has built national highways at double
the pace than the last government, if it has built crores of toilets,
transferred more than Rs 5 lakh crore in more than 450 schemes through direct
benefit transfer, or if it is talking about Dalit venture capitalist fund, then
why these issues do not get as much mention as they deserve? If these schemes
were implemented effectively, the benefit must have reached people from all
sections of the society.
If the media were to be believed, Modi’s austerity is for
shutterbugs, his interminable work hours a source of fun, and his nationalism
just for show. Perhaps, this media should not be believed. Or, perhaps, it is
time journalists removed their tinted glasses and see Modi for the man and the
prime minister he is.
What can we expect from Narendra Modi in his second term?
(This write-up appeared as a 'Quick-Take' in The Print)
If in 2014 Narendra Modi was a gamble, in 2019 he has been an informed choice. If the vote for Modi then was an expression of anti-incumbency, this time it has been an assertion of the right course. If Modi 1.0 was magic and wave, then Modi 2.0 is the voice of ‘New India’ loud and clear.
In his second term, Modi will make India more inclusive
If in 2014 Narendra Modi was a gamble, in 2019 he has been an informed choice. If the vote for Modi then was an expression of anti-incumbency, this time it has been an assertion of the right course. If Modi 1.0 was magic and wave, then Modi 2.0 is the voice of ‘New India’ loud and clear.
The Modi government was formed five years ago with the
slogan of “Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas” and in 2019, “Sabka Vishwas” has been added
to this equation. Over the span of his first term, Modi tried to reach every
section of society through a range of schemes and programmes. These programmes
directly benefitted over 20 crore people and it has been a result of this that
the 2019 elections have defied the traditional vertical identities of caste,
language and religion, among others.
We now have the rise of interest groups – women, farmers,
disabled, poor – with which people associate more. Modi has emerged as the
voice of these interest groups and during his second term, these groups will be
heard more and more, as he moves to make a more inclusive India.
The task ahead for Modi is not easy, but he has never been
the one to choose an easy goal. In Modi, India has found the leader who has the
grit to take difficult decisions without electoral considerations. In the
coming years, we can expect more action on the lines of ‘what must be done’ by
the government instead of ‘what can be done’.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Spotlight
This Eklavya won't sacrifice his thumb
My article on aspirations of the Indian youth was published in The Pioneer . You can read a version of the article here ...

-
(This article was first published in Employment News ) Swami Vivekanand is the greatest youth icon produced by India and one that in...
-
डॉ श्रीप्रकाश सिंह द्वारा सम्पादित पुस्तक पॉलिटिक्स फॉर अ न्यू इंडिया: अ नेशनलिस्टिक पर्सपेक्टिव ` की पाञ्चजन्य में प्रकाशित मेरी समीक्ष...
-
This article first appeared in Rashtriya Chatrashakti magazine The recent escalation with Pakistan and the government’s bold decision ...