Huffington Post published my rejoinder to Pratap Bhanu Mehta's article on Bhartiyata.
You can read a version of it below:
A gathering of around 700 academics last month in Delhi raised many hackles. The academics had reportedly come to attend a workshop aimed at discussing ways to create an ecosystem for the Indic knowledge tradition. The objective of the workshop and the fact that it was being organised by RSS, was criticised.
You can read a version of it below:
A gathering of around 700 academics last month in Delhi raised many hackles. The academics had reportedly come to attend a workshop aimed at discussing ways to create an ecosystem for the Indic knowledge tradition. The objective of the workshop and the fact that it was being organised by RSS, was criticised.
Among its fiercest critics was Pratap Bhanu Mehta (PBM).
In his article "Yes, Bring on Bhartiyata" on 29
March, PBM wondered if those looking for Bhartiyata would be able to stomach
the results of their search at all. He also indicted that discovery of
Bhartiyata should lead to autonomy of educational institutions as seen in
ancient gurukuls. It is ironic, though, that something similar was voiced at
this workshop by a senior RSS functionary, "As per history of Bharat, the
education system was completely independent of government control. The society
was taking care of education system."
My contention, however, is simple. If the RSS cannot lead
the Indic knowledge tradition, who will?
Indic traditions in the past have been carried forward like
a relay race, with torchbearers through the centuries such as Buddha,
Shankaracharya, Tulsi, Kabir Vivekananda, Dayananda and many more. Moreover,
there was never a single torch—many ideas cut through the darkness at the same
time. Sadly, all that is passé. No one wants to carry that light of Indic ideas
now and the curious few are left in the dark fumbling over different limbs of
the elephant. The efforts of the RSS are to reignite these lights and others
too can do the same.
Why Pratap Bhanu Mehta?
To put things in perspective, PBM is one of the leading
intellectual lights of our times. He fiercely writes on current issues and his
nuanced views set him apart from others. Besides bringing his uniquely
positioned views to everyday issues, PBM's writings include subjects that are
not part of the collective sub-consciousness of left-liberals, like Varanasi,
Vivekananda, Abhinavagupta and Bharityata. It seems he believes that along with
"foreign" theory and ideas, there should be a thriving
"Indic" or Bharatiya intellectual tradition. It's very rare to find a
parallel of PBM's thoughts in the writings of those who are considered
mainstream intellectuals and academics.
He once wrote on Vivekananda, "Vivekananda was central
to many of the intellectual undercurrents that made modern India possible. He
was the progenitor of projects central to modern Indian identity."
On Abhinavagupta he wrote:"There are moments of
intellectual achievement that are beyond measure. They deserve recognition and
engagement. In any reckoning of Indian intellectual history, one figure whose
achievement is almost unparalleled is Abhinavagupta... He lies at the centre of
so many currents of intellectual thinking: Aesthetics, literary criticism,
dramaturgy, music, tantra, yoga, devotional poetry, cognitive science,
emotions, philosophy of mind, language."
PBM advocates an Indic tradition but on many occasions, he
has also criticised the present establishment and its affiliated organisations
that profess commitment to Indianness. Besides PBM, there is not one scholar
from an academic institution or outside who regularly writes on these issues in
the mainstream media. This also accounts for the complete absence of these
subjects from popular discourse.
Hence, I don't care about the arguments of the left-liberals
from academics, media and NGOs whose outrage is selective and opinions warped.
But I do care when one of the most acclaimed "liberal" public
intellectuals trashes the intellectual efforts of the RSS and its ideological
affiliates including BJP.
Why the RSS?
In the current scenario, the Vivekanandas and Abhinavaguptas
do not find a place in our syllabus. There is no Indian philosophy centre in
JNU and while all major religions exist in India, there are no centres of
comparative religions in Indian universities.
In this light, the RSS emerges as the only organisation that
has been making concerted efforts to keep the Indic tradition alive. It is
another matter that with the BJP government in power, we get to hear more and
more of it, and mostly in the words of the reporter who has been taught to see
the organisation as a band of fanatics. The event, Gyan Sangam, too came to the
fore like this. It was yet another attempt to "saffronise" education.
Period. The words "national values", "colonial ways" and
"burnt libraries" in the event's concept note were red flagged. And
yet, there were other parts of it that no one wanted to read:
"We need to develop a Bharatiya Drishti—an 'Indian Way'
or Indic tradition to look at all the perpetuating problems of the world.
Before that we need to understand ourselves - develop a vantage point of our
knowledge tradition, study when and how it got weak and how it could be
revived. We can reform only when we know the form. Indic comprises anything
that originates from this land, blossoms in this atmosphere and prospers in
this geo-cultural territory. An Indic tradition can lead to assimilative points
of view, nuanced solutions and the creation of truly 'new'. An Indic ecosystem
can provide the adequate environment to discuss our civilisation background,
its legacy and relevance as well as its lessons."
In his critique of the meet, PBM admits that colonialism and
leftist influence on intellectual society of India spelt doom for Indic
thought. He, however, asks us to wonder why a worthy rival of Western
educational centres like Oxford could not come up in India. He also questions
the intent and credibility of the RSS for organising such events.
For the last 70 years, we had governments at the helm those
did not want any truck with Indic tradition. But the denudation of trust in
Indianness had started centuries ago. However, PBM says we must not fall prey
to truisms, and I will listen to him. My contention, therefore, is of the
present.
In my view, the RSS is an organisation which believes that
Indic tradition should find a place in our modern knowledge system and is
working towards it. One could argue that the RSS does not enjoy the sort of
intellectual credibility that comes out of having engaged with institutional
academic tradition for years. However, this insinuation primarily stems from
lack of knowledge about the RSS and its institutions. Moreover, the RSS does
not claim to have become the source point for such an intellectual exercise. In
fact, its aim is merely to ensure that some of the solutions for the challenges
that the world faces today, should come from this soil.
In our country, most of the liberal space in India is
occupied by those who called themselves left-liberals. PBM is one of the rare
liberal sightings to emerge with new thoughts and propositions and feel no
shame in raising subjects like Abhinavagupta and Natyashastra. The blatant lack
of intellectuals willing to be identified with such academic pursuits, even if
for the sake of sheer intellectual curiosity, makes me wonder: Why shouldn't
the RSS organise such a conference? Why did our academic institutions never
think of doing it themselves? Why did a thesis appendix full of Western
references become an academic insignia? Why are Plato, Aristotle and Marx still
more important in our classrooms than Chanakya, Shanti Parva and Vivekananda?
As far as the intent of the RSS in organising the event is
concerned, an idea of it can be drawn by taking a look at the resolutions
passed by the organisation's supreme body in the past few years. Leftist
ideologues have, for years, pinned their aversion of the RSS to a 1939 pamphlet
which they claim was written by Golwalkar. I think liberals like PBM should not
fall in this trap and try to understand the RSS in today's context. Like any
organisation that lives past nine decades, the RSS must have had a journey and
it is important to see the organisation for what it intends to be today.
From the threat of imposing the Hindutva agenda, to backing
saffron-gamcha-clad lumpen elements on the streets—one gets the feeling that
the RSS is behind it all. The truth, however, is far from this. The RSS
believes in a "Samarth Bharat" which has a place for everyone; there
is need for people like Pratap Bhanu Mehta to interact with the RSS and then
form an opinion.
One thing is for sure—you cannot ignore the activities of
the RSS on the ground even if you trash their intellectual efforts. They are
not the alternative discourse but the main discourse of this country today.
Deal with them. Honest research into RSS and its activities has the potential
to throw up astounding facts; the RSS too can learn from the intellectuals like
PBM. I am keeping my fingers crossed.
No comments:
Post a Comment